State v. Richards

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the fact that the defendant had a beard and was missing a stocking cap, which differed from the suspect’s description, was not significant, given his closeness to the suspect’s description in other respects and his proximity in time and place to the crime scene
• “reasonable suspicion” existed based on a recently reported rape and the similarity of the defendant’s description to the description of the perpetrator

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ricks
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-04-12· cited 4×
• State v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-08-07· cited 3×
• State v. Worthington
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-09-10· cited 3×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Valdez
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1977-03-24· cited 229×
• State v. Cloman
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1969-06-18· cited 145×
• State v. Canape
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-06-02· cited 17×
• State v. Denny
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-11-22· cited 15×
• State v. Ponce
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-12-10· cited 15×
• State v. Ragsdale
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-05-30· cited 14×
• State v. Armstrong
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-05-11· cited 9×