State v. Richards

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that “[t]he phrase ‘chemical analysis’ commonly includes ‘tests for identifying chemical compounds by their physical properties, as the Intoxilyzer does’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Loren K. McMillan
  Eighth Circuit· 1987-07-14· cited 35×
• Lemond v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1995-02-21· cited 24×
• State v. Garton
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1986-07-09· cited 16×
• State v. Likness
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1986-04-16· cited 14×
• State v. Squires
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-12-21· cited 8×
• Wangsness v. Aldinger
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-07-28· cited 3×
• Blazer v. Dep't of Public Safety
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2024-12-11· cited 1×
• Pueblo v. Quiñones Cardona
  Tribunal De Apelaciones De Puerto Rico/Court of Appeals of Puerto Rico· 2005-07-15

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Frye v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
• State v. Huettl
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-12-11· cited 36×
• State v. Anderson
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1984-12-12· cited 34×
• State v. Helmer
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1979-05-17· cited 25×
• State v. Moore
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1973-06-27· cited 21×
• City of Dayton v. Schenck
  City of Dayton Municipal Court· 1980-02-11· cited 14×
• State v. Dorsey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-08-04· cited 6×
• Husk v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1985-04-09· cited 5×
• McConnell v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1983-08-19· cited 3×