Skip to main content

State v. Richards

Citations

  • 229 N.W.2d 229
  • 1975 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1119

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting State’s argument that the written request may follow the test and “ratif[y] what had been done”
  • “[N]othing prevents the trial court from correcting the ruling at any time before final judgment.”
  • rejecting State’s argument that the written request may follow the test and “ratif[y] what had been done”
  • peace officer failed to make timely written request of defendant to submit to blood test
  • a written request that follows a test is untimely and does not comply with the implied consent statute; test results are therefore inadmissible
  • peace officer failed to make timely written request of defendant to submit to blood test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Mason, Rawlings, Uhlenhopp, McCormick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.