State v. Richard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The fact that appellant placed the goods in a shopping bag provided no valid reason for the trial court to infer a criminal intent or a possession clearly adverse to the interest of the store”
• \The fact that appellant placed the goods in a shopping bag provided no valid reason for the trial court to infer a criminal intent or a possession clearly adverse to the interest of the store.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Welch v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1992-12-22· cited 47×
• Commonwealth v. Davis
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1996-07-30· cited 4×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hauck
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1973-07-20· cited 26×
• Durphy v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1967-11-27· cited 21×
• Gettinger v. State
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1882-07-15· cited 20×