District Court of Appeal of Florida· 12/22/1992
State v. Richard
Citations
- 610 So. 2d 107
- 1992 WL 379862
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the trial court applied the wrong version of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191 and granting relief from a per curiam affirmance
- holding the trial court applied the wrong version of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191 and granting relief from a per curiam affirmance
- holding the trial court applied the wrong version of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191 and granting relief from a per curiam affirmance
- exercising jurisdiction to quash a circuit court appellate division per curiam affirmance of county court order discharging defendant without affording the state the benefit of required “window period” to bring defendant to trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schwartz, C.J., and Barkdull and Levy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United Automobile Insurance Co. v. a 1st Choice Healthcare SystemsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-11-04· cited 12×
- State v. LopezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-03-18· cited 8×
- Granada Insurance Co. v. Mark A. Cereceda, D.C., P.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-12-31· cited 1×
- GRANADA INS. CO. v. CerecedaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-12-31
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.