State v. Reynolds
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 5813
Syllabus
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the Crim.R. 32.1 motion to withdraw guilty plea of defendant-appellant Mark C. Reynolds. Res judicata precludes claims of ineffective assistance of counsel that could have been brought on direct appeal. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the Crim.R. 32.1 motion without a hearing and without findings of fact or conclusions of law. All four assignments of error overruled; judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas affirmed.
Judges: Leland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1977-03-23· cited 1,253×
- State v. BlantonOhio Supreme Court· 2022-11-10· cited 86×
- State v. ChandlerOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-10-22· cited 33×
- State v. MoncriefOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-10-15· cited 30×
- State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-01-14· cited 18×
- State v. MirandaOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-11-19· cited 10×
- State v. LittleOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-04-19· cited 8×
- State v. TaylorOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-24· cited 7×
- State v. NeguseOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-03-29· cited 5×
- State v. PriceOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-12-12· cited 4×
- State v. HughesOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-12-23· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.