State v. Repici

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that missing portions of the transcript on appeal are presumed to support the actions of the district court
• holding that portions of a transcript missing on appeal are presumed to support the actions of the district court
• holding that missing portions of the transcript on appeal are presumed to support the actions of the district court
• ruling missing record on appeal presumed to support trial court’s actions
• “[M]issing portions of the record are presumed to support the action of the district court.”
• ruling appellate court presumes missing transcript support district court’s actions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).