State v. Rembert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \[u]npermitted and intentional contacts . . . [are] actionable as an offensive contact\
• stating that “[ujnpermitted and intentional contacts ... [are] actionable as an offensive contact”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Nason
  First Circuit· 2001-10-19· cited 101×
• United States v. Mulkern
  First Circuit· 2017-04-14· cited 22×
• People v. B.L.
  California Court of Appeal· 2015-08-31· cited 11×
• United States v. Voisine
  First Circuit· 2015-02-02· cited 9×
• United States v. Duval
  D. Massachusetts· 2013-07-17· cited 9×
• State v. Robbins
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2010-07-20· cited 8×
• State v. Gantnier
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2012-11-01· cited 4×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Fisher v. Carrousel Motor Hotel, Inc.
  Texas Supreme Court· 1967-12-27· cited 152×
• State v. Spearin
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1984-05-31· cited 22×
• Raymond v. State
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1983-10-31· cited 18×
• State v. Rowe
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1982-12-06· cited 12×
• Malczewski v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-01-25· cited 10×