State v. Rekar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “it was the corporation-counsel relationship that was the basis for the attorney-client privilege in In re Spalding Sports, not the inventor-counsel relationship.”
• holding Section 1338 jurisdiction existed over state law claim alleging breach of duty to assign a patent because claim required resolution of the disputed patent application
• holding Section 1338 jurisdiction existed over state law claim alleging breach of duty to assign a patent because claim required resolution of the disputed patent application
• deferring to trial court’s judgment “on matters closely associated with the standard functions of the adjudicative process,” such as discovery matters, “as long as that judgment is not an abuse of the trial court’s discretion”
• deferring to trial court’s judgment “on matters closely associated with the standard functions of the adjudicative process,” such as discovery matters, “as long as that judgment is not an abuse of the trial court’s discretion”
• noting court’s discretion in denying motion to compel discovery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).