State v. Reineke
Citations
- 89 Ohio St. (N.S.) 390
Syllabus
<p>Criminal law — Sexual crimes — Evidence of prior and subsequent acts admissible, when.</p> <p>In sexual crimes with consent, including incest, other and similar adulterous or licentious acts or conduct by the defendant toward the prosecutrix, whether prior or subsequent to the date of the specific act charged in the indictment, are, if not too remote, admissible for the purpose of showing the adulterous or incestuous disposition of the defendant toward the prosecutrix and the illicit and continuous sexual relations existing between them. (Rasor v. State, 78 Ohio St., 449, distinguished.)</p>
Judges: Donahue, Johnson, Newman, Shauck, Wanamaker, Wilkin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.