State v. Register

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• setting forth essentially the same considerations for a warrant or order compelling a bodily intrusion into a potential witness
• setting out standards for when a search warrant may issue for the blood and saliva of a third party who is not a suspect, defendant, victim, or witness in a criminal investigation
• “only if this stringent standard is met” may intrusion be sustained

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Baccus
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-01-09· cited 298×
• State v. Simmons
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-06-17· cited 49×
• State v. Dupree
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-09-18· cited 43×
• Bartlett v. Hamwi
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-11-10· cited 16×
• Commonwealth v. Draheim
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2006-06-27· cited 10×
• Commonwealth v. Kostka
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2015-06-17· cited 3×
• Gantt v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-04-28· cited 2×
• IN RE GRAND JURY WITNESS G.B. v. UNITED STATES
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-05-26· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Schmerber v. California
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
• People v. Melton
  California Supreme Court· 1988-03-03· cited 430×
• People v. Scott
  California Supreme Court· 1978-05-16· cited 222×
• Ex Parte Whetstone
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-05-22· cited 23×
• People v. Browning
  California Court of Appeal· 1980-07-11· cited 14×
• In Re Snyder
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-04-13· cited 9×
• Shults v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1980-12-19· cited 7×