State v. Reese
Citations
- 112 Wash. 507
- 192 P. 934
- 11 A.L.R. 1018
- 1920 Wash. LEXIS 762
Syllabus
<p>Criminax. Law (29-2)—Venue—Constitutional Provisions— Right to Trial by Jury of Vicinage. Under Const., art. 1, § 22, granting to accused persons the right to a speedy, public trial by an impartial jury of the county in which the offense is alleged to have been committed, one accused of crime has a right to be tried in the county in which the offense is alleged to have been committed.</p> <p>Same. Rem. & Bal. Code, § 2293, making the route traversed by a railway car, train or other public conveyance, and the water traversed by any boat, criminal districts, and providing that the jurisdiction of offenses committed on any such railway car, train or boat, or at any station or depot upon such route, shall be in any county through which such car, train or boat may pass during the trip or voyage, or in which the trip or voyage may begin or terminate, is void as in violation of Const., art. 1, § 22, guaranteeing to the accused the right to be tried in the county in which the offense is alleged to have been committed.</p>
Judges: Main
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Watt v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1888-10-02· cited 61×
- Hilliker v. FarrMichigan Supreme Court· 1907-09-20· cited 13×
- People v. BrookMichigan Supreme Court· 1907-09-20· cited 12×
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Missouri· 1905-11-21· cited 11×
- State v. CarrollWashington Supreme Court· 1909-11-09· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.