Skip to main content

State v. Reed

Citations

  • 144 P.3d 677
  • 282 Kan. 272
  • 2006 Kan. LEXIS 663

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that in order to establish a due process violation, the appellant must demonstrate prejudice
  • holding the district court did not abuse its discretion for the admission of a taped 911 call in addition to the dispatcher's testimony because the tape corroborated the dispatcher's testimony and captured the suspect's demeanor during the crime
  • no abuse of discretion unless no reasonable person would take the position of the judge
  • court has power to exclude evidence that is cumulative

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Luckert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.