Skip to main content

State v. Reed

Citations

  • 334 S.W.3d 619
  • 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 114
  • 2011 WL 397021

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant has the burden to prove elements of a Brady claim
  • holding that the burden to prove a Brady violation lies on the defendant
  • reviewing for abuse of discretion trial court's decision to sanction the State for a Brady violation
  • “When assessing evidence’s materiality, we take into account the cumulative effect of the suppressed evidence in light of other evidence, not merely the probative value of the suppressed evidence standing alone.”
  • “Prejudice in [the] context [of a Brady violation] is interchangeable with materiality.”
  • recognizable clothing that identifies a defendant as the person who committed a crime, in combination with witness testimony that the person who committed the crime was wearing that same clothing, is sufficient evidence to find the defendant guilty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gaertner, Hoff, Cohen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.