Skip to main content

State v. Reed

Citations

  • 732 P.2d 66
  • 83 Or. App. 451
  • 1987 Ore. App. LEXIS 2849

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the HGN for the purpose of proving BAC is a scientific method, requiring expert testimony
  • certain reactions to alcohol are so commonly known that they are not considered scientific evidence, but nystagmus does not fall into this category
  • although arresting officer was qualified to give HGN test, she was not qualified as expert on relationship, if any, between alcohol consumption and nystagmus
  • certain reactions to alcohol are so commonly known that they are not considered scientific evidence, but nystagmus does not fall into this category

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Van Hoomissen Young, Young

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.