Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
West Virginia Supreme Court· 2/27/2003

State v. Redman

Citations

  • 578 S.E.2d 369
  • 213 W. Va. 175
  • 2003 W. Va. LEXIS 3

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rulings issued by lower tribunals “must contain the requisite findings of fact and conclusions of law ‘to permit meaningful appellate review’”
  • rejecting that the argument that there were insufficient findings to permit meaningful appellate review of the denial of a Rule 35(b) motion
  • quoting, in part, Syl. Pt. 3, Fayette Cnty. Nat’l Bank v. Lilly, 199 W. Va. 349, 484 S.E.2d 232 (1997), overruled on other grounds by Sostaric v. Marshall, 234 W. Va. 449, 766 S.E.2d 396 (2014)
  • quoting, in part, Syl. Pt. 3, Fayette Cnty. Nat’l Bank v. Lilly, 199 W. Va. 349, 484 S.E.2d 232 (1997), overruled on other grounds by Sostaric v. Marshall, 234 W. Va. 449, 766 S.E.2d 396 (2014)
  • “Upon our review of the transcript from the hearings related to the sentencing issue, we do not find that the lower court abused its discretion.”
  • “Upon our review of the transcript from the hearings related to the sentencing issue, we do not find that the lower court abused its discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.