State v. Reber

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that denomination requirement of Rule 74.01(a) does not apply to Rules 29.15 and 24.035
• relying on Rule 29.15(k) to find that the denomination requirement under Rule 74.01(a) is not applicable to post-conviction appeals
• application of the denomination requirement of Rule 74.01(a) runs counter to the purposes of Rules 29.15 and 24.035 and is, therefore, not applicable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Watson v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2018-02-27· cited 23×
• M.P.W. v. R.H.W.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1999-01-05· cited 11×
• Sittner v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2013-08-13· cited 9×
• Mercer v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2017-03-14· cited 8×
• Wise v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2007-04-05· cited 7×
• Missouri Department of Mental Health v. Juvenile Officer
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1999-06-30· cited 6×
• State of Missouri v. Pete Wright
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2016-09-13· cited 4×
• In Re CAD
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1999-06-30· cited 1×
• Kyle Sanford v. Centurytel of Missouri, LLC
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2015-10-28
• In the Interest of: J.N.W. v. Juvenile Officer
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2022-02-15

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Day v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1989-05-16· cited 537×
• Thomas v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1991-05-03· cited 81×