State v. R.D.W. (In re R.D.W.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “[a]dult women have a Fourteenth Amendment right to terminate a pre-viability pregnancy”
• noting that a plaintiff need only “reasonable fear a statute would be enforced against it if it engaged in certain conduct”
• stating that federal courts must interpret state statutes in the same manner as that state’s highest court would
• explaining that the attorney general may be an improper defendant when they cannot bindingly direct prosecutions
• treating the proper defendant analysis as satisfied by the same factors as the constitutional standing analysis
• noting that the two inquiries share a “common denominator”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).