State v. Raven

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that courts refrain from taking sua sponte action, particularly where defense counsel may have strategic reasons for not pursuing certain avenues at trial
• ‘We have consistently held that we will not consider issues raised on appeal that were not presented in the trial court.” (quotation and brackets omitted)
• defendant not entitled to defense of another instruction because he “did not admit to any of the facts alleged in the indictment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).