Court of Appeals of Arizona· 7/8/1976
State v. Ratzlaff
Citations
- 552 P.2d 461
- 27 Ariz. App. 174
- 1976 Ariz. App. LEXIS 566
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “it seems reasonable to require the State to use the Uniform Act to at least attempt to enforce the attendance of an absent witness, even though he is in the military service”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haire, Eubank, Department, Froeb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. EdwardsArizona Supreme Court· 1983-05-04· cited 61×
- State v. VaskoCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-03-10· cited 36×
- State v. ChapmanUtah Supreme Court· 1982-09-16· cited 19×
- State v. RayArizona Supreme Court· 1979-07-30· cited 15×
- State v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-08-20· cited 13×
- Breeden v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-04-01· cited 8×
- State v. RayCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-10-10· cited 1×
- Shreve v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-08-09· cited 1×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.