Skip to main content

State v. Ratliff

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 3315

Syllabus

The trial court did not err by denying appellant's motion to suppress where the officer who initiated the investigative traffic stop of appellant's vehicle had reasonable articulable suspicion to stop appellant's vehicle after he observed appellant speeding and driving erratically which caused appellant to nearly strike the curb several times during the early morning hours of a wet, cold, wintery day.

Judges: S. Powell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.