State v. Rasmus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Certainly defendant could not complain of a ruling he asked the court to make.”
• “Certainly defendant could not complain of a ruling he asked the court to make.”
• “We deem it proper to suggest that the practice of disposing of an indictment, ... upon which a trial was then in progress, in the seclusion of the judge’s chambers is not to be commended.”
• “A party to a criminal proceeding . . . will not be permitted to allege an error in which he himself acquiesced, or which was committed or invited by him, or was the natural consequence of his own 12 actions.”
• “A party to a criminal proceeding . . . will not be permitted to allege an error . . . in which he himself acquiesced, or which was committed or invited by him, or was the natural consequence of his own actions.” (second alteration in original) (citation omitted)
• “A party to a criminal 1 We lack jurisdiction even if we found that Parmely’s filed motion in arrest of judgment was not barred by his waiver of the same. Orders denying a motion in arrest of judgment are governed by procedures for discretionary review. See Iowa Code § 814.6(2)(f

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).