Skip to main content
· 3/1/1975

State v. Rasler

Citations

  • 532 P.2d 1077
  • 216 Kan. 292
  • 1975 Kan. LEXIS 327

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding a probation violation was supported by sufficient evidence regardless of the outcome of the defendant's appeal of the conviction forming the basis of the violation
  • to sustain order revoking probation because of commission of new criminal offense, State need not prove commission of offense beyond reasonable doubt
  • to sustain order revoking probation because of commission of new criminal offense, State need not prove commission of offense beyond reasonable doubt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kaul

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.