State v. Raposa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the substitution of “the State” for “the State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations” in a complaint is a defect in form that does not invalidate that complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. LaPlante
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1979-12-06· cited 8×
• State v. Berker
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1974-01-18· cited 7×
• State v. D'AMICO
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1972-07-12· cited 3×
• State v. Bruneau
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2003-05-16· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Contreras
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1969-05-14· cited 72×
• Lemons v. State
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1870-01-15· cited 36×
• Anter v. Ambeault
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1968-08-13· cited 24×
• State v. Carter
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-18· cited 20×
• State v. Lisi
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1969-05-14· cited 14×
• State v. Scofield
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1958-02-04· cited 12×
• D'AREZZO v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co.
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1967-04-04· cited 5×