Court of Appeals of Utah· 12/29/1993
State v. Rangel
Citations
- 866 P.2d 607
- 229 Utah Adv. Rep. 51
- 1993 Utah App. LEXIS 212
- 1993 WL 540101
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining that “vague objections” “were not specific enough to properly raise and preserve [the argument] for appeal”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Greenwood, Jackson, Garff
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- City of Orem v. HenrieCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1994-02-04· cited 28×
- Zavala v. ZavalaCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2016-01-14· cited 15×
- State v. Beltran-FelixCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1996-07-05· cited 14×
- State v. StraderCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1995-08-31· cited 10×
- State v. GarnerCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2008-01-25· cited 9×
- State v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2017-07-07· cited 7×
- State v. PillingCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1994-05-27· cited 3×
- Citimortgage, Inc. v. StephensonCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2015-08-13
- State Ex Rel. A.M.D.Court of Appeals of Utah· 2006-11-09
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.