State v. Randall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that DNA evidence collected over a month after the alleged crime was not material, as it could not be used to prove Defendant was not involved in a sexual relationship with a minor
• holding that DNA evidence collected over a month after the alleged crime was not material, as it could not be used to prove Defendant was not involved in a sexual relationship with a minor
• noting that those who plead guilty have more difficulty in alleging materiality
• noting that those who plead guilty have more difficulty in alleging materiality
• acknowledging \the inherent difficulty in establishing the materiality required by N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-269 for a defendant who pleaded guilty[.]\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Tilghman
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-10-02· cited 4×
• State v. Alexander
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2020-04-21
• State v. Alexander
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 2022-03-11

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Cox
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2016-02-02· cited 13×
• State v. Lane
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 2018-03-02· cited 12×