State v. Randall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that when there is a basis on which to resolve a claim without reaching a novel constitutional argument, courts generally should do so
• declining to address the trial court’s ruling on the defendant’s constitutional claims because his evidentiary argument, 11 which the trial court did not rule on, presented a basis on which his motion to suppress could be resolved without reaching the constitutional issues

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dias v. Boone
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2025-02-18· cited 11×
• McKinney v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2024-03-05· cited 6×
• La Anyane v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2025-03-04· cited 3×
• RBC GLOBAL ASSET MANAGEMENT (U.S.) INC. v. LATTIMORE
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2024-10-15· cited 2×
• State v. Dias
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2025-03-13· cited 1×
• State v. Christine Dias
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2024-07-18
• Manuel Garcia v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2024-11-19
• TUSSAHAW RESERVES, LLC v. BUTTS COUNTY
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2025-10-21
• Venticinque v. Lair
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2025-12-09

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Deal v. Coleman
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2013-11-18· cited 498×
• Olds v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2016-05-23· cited 258×
• Wilson v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2023-02-07· cited 44×
• State v. Mondor
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2019-06-28· cited 33×
• State v. Randall
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2022-10-25· cited 6×
• In THE INTEREST OF C.C., Children
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2022-08-23· cited 4×