State v. Ramsay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• State v. Mack, 89 Wn.2d 788, 576 P.2d 44 (1978) requires that JCrR 3.08 be interpreted in a manner consistent with CrR 3.3
• waiver bearing an explicit expiration date is effective until its expiration date

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-11-10· cited 58×
• State v. Jones
  Washington Supreme Court· 1988-07-15· cited 23×
• City of Kennewick v. Vandergriff
  Washington Supreme Court· 1987-10-01· cited 14×
• City of Bremerton v. Hoyt
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-06-18· cited 7×
• State v. Helms
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-12-28· cited 6×
• State v. Bartlett
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1989-11-22· cited 3×
• State v. Hamilton
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-05-13· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. MacK
  Washington Supreme Court· 1978-03-09· cited 101×
• State v. Aleshire
  Washington Supreme Court· 1977-09-15· cited 57×
• State v. Pomeroy
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1977-12-21· cited 22×
• State v. Christopher
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1978-07-24· cited 10×
• State v. Lindbo
  Washington Supreme Court· 1980-07-31· cited 9×
• State v. Burroughs
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1979-04-23· cited 6×
• Harkins v. South District Justice Court
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1983-04-27· cited 4×
• State v. Bjelland
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1979-02-21· cited 1×