State v. Ramos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• resentencing that would include imposing conditions of placement would not be ministerial
• defendant has no constitutional right to be present for a 5 We also deny Miranda’s “Motion for Reference Hearing,” which he filed on December 3, 2025, separately from his personal restraint petition briefing. 12 No. 86064-0-I/13 purely ministerial hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ramos
  Washington Supreme Court· 2017-01-12· cited 177×
• In re the Personal Restraint of McWilliams
  Washington Supreme Court· 2014-12-24· cited 34×
• State of Washington v. Joel R. Ramos
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-08-13· cited 11×
• In re Pers. Restraint of McWilliams
  Washington Supreme Court· 2014-12-24
• State v. Rodriguez Ramos
  Washington Supreme Court· 2017-01-12
• Personal Restraint Petition Of Ronald Sorenson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2017-10-03

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Broadaway
  Washington Supreme Court· 1997-08-21· cited 290×
• State v. Rupe
  Washington Supreme Court· 1987-09-17· cited 177×
• State v. Davenport
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-09-25· cited 16×
• State v. Ramos
  Washington Supreme Court· 2010-04-01· cited 5×
• State v. Ramos
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2010-06-22· cited 4×