State v. Ramirez
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1542
Syllabus
Hybrid sentences, community-control sanction, child-support order, invited-error doctrine, motion to withdraw a guilty plea. Ramirez appeals the journal entry sentencing him to 11 months in prison for attempted unlawful sexual conduct with a minor and requiring him to pay child support while incarcerated. The child-support order is a community-control sanction, which cannot be imposed along with a prison term for a felony offense. Ramirez did not \invite\ this sanction under the invited-error doctrine because it was not part of the settlement agreement the parties presented to the court. The court also did not abuse its discretion in denying Ramirez's motion to withdraw his guilty plea. The 11-month sentence was less than the maximum authorized for a fifth-degree felony, and the record did not support Ramirez's claims that the court was swayed by emotion, failed to adequately consider his request, or that he was under the influence of medication during his sentencing hearing.
Judges: Forbes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1977-03-23· cited 1,253×
- Ohio v. VinsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-11-03· cited 66×
- State v. D-BeyOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-01-14· cited 30×
- State v. BeattyOhio Supreme Court· 2024-12-09· cited 16×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-10-27· cited 5×
- In re S.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-04-07· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.