Skip to main content
· 8/14/2000

State v. Ramacher

Citations

  • 94 Haw. 54
  • 7 P.3d 1091

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a fee agreement that complies with section 5904(d) is reasonable absent evidence to the contrary
  • “[I]n conducting a review of a fee agreement, a finding by the Board regarding the excessiveness or unreasonableness of the fee is entitled to no deference.”
  • fee agreement calling for contingency fee of 20% com-, ported with section 5904(d)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.