Ohio Court of Appeals· 10/13/2017

State v. Radford

Citations

2017 Ohio 8189

Syllabus

Defendant-appellant's convictions, following a jury trial, for trafficking in cocaine, trafficking in heroin, and having a weapon while under disability are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The determination that the convictions are not against the weight of the evidence is dispositive of Defendant-appellant's sufficiency of the evidence argument. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Ramey
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-08-03· cited 10×
State v. Greenlee
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-10-02· cited 3×
State v. Beall
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-16· cited 3×
State v. Laraby
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-01-12· cited 2×
City of Dayton v. Patrick
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-01-19· cited 1×
State v. Broadus
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-01-08· cited 1×
State v. Brown
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-03· cited 1×
State v. Combs
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-06-22
State v. Byrd
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-03
State v. Ellis
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-25

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Thompkins
Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
State v. Jenks
Ohio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
State v. Haynes
Ohio Supreme Court· 1971-03-17· cited 246×
State v. Adams
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-08-08· cited 99×
State v. Pilgrim
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2009-10-08· cited 92×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.