State v. R. L. W.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that we are not bound by concessions of error
• declining to accept the state’s concession based on alleged insufficiency of evi- dence to support civil commitment when deciding that the evidence in the record did support the trial court’s decision
• “We are not bound by concessions of error; we have an obligation to make an independent determination of the appropriate disposition of a case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. L. R.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-02-08· cited 65×
• State v. M. A.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-03-02· cited 44×
• State v. T. C.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-08-23· cited 38×
• State v. Cook
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-12-24· cited 8×
• State v. Long-Ellis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-01-31· cited 5×
• State v. S. P.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-11-09· cited 3×
• State v. C. C. N.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-08-07· cited 1×
• State v. L. M. T. (In re L. M. T.)
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-05-31
• State v. C. T. B.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-04-29

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ball v. Gladden
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1968-07-17· cited 849×
• Department of Human Services v. N. P.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-07-24· cited 222×
• State v. D. M.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-09-08· cited 21×
• State v. Bierstock
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-10-06· cited 3×