State v. QUINTERO-MARTINEZ

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to reach the defendant’s unpreserved assignment of error where it was certain that the trial court would correct its sentencing error in a manner that left intact the defendant’s total aggregate sentence
• discretion not exercised where the defendant was sure to be resentenced to an aggregate of 120 months in prison, regardless of absence of other factors
• trial judge’s statements on the record indicated that he intended that the defendant serve a certain amount of time for successful rehabilitation so there was certainty that the trial court would impose the same sentence on remand
• “[W]e are certain that, if we were to remand this case to the trial court, it would correct its error in a manner that leaves intact defendant’s total aggregate sentence of 120 months.”
• imposition of multiple “gun minimum” sentences is “plain error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Capri
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-02-29· cited 20×
• State v. Garlitz
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-08-23· cited 6×
• State v. Chiew Tong Saechao
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-04-24· cited 5×
• State v. Allen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-05-24· cited 4×
• State v. HIEU DOAN TRUONG
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-03-28· cited 3×
• State v. Toquero
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-05-27· cited 3×
• State v. MOORE-ZUNIGA
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-05-13· cited 1×
• State v. Galloway
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-01-07· cited 1×
• State v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-04-01· cited 1×