New Mexico Supreme Court· 4/29/1982
State v. Quintana
Citations
- 644 P.2d 531
- 98 N.M. 17
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The opposing party to summary 18 disposition must come forward and specifically point out errors in fact and in law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Riordan, Easley, Sosa, Payne, Federici
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1933-11-06· cited 477×
- State v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1979-02-27· cited 89×
- Carver v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1897-01-04· cited 83×
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1908-03-02· cited 75×
- Shuman v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1978-05-17· cited 29×
- Johnson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1978-05-19· cited 17×
- State v. StewartNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1924-11-17· cited 12×
- State v. SanfordNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1939-12-29· cited 7×
- State v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1923-03-13· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.