Skip to main content

State v. Quigg

Citations

  • 866 P.2d 655
  • 72 Wash. App. 828
  • 1994 Wash. App. LEXIS 58

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an expert was qualified to testify about the grooming process
  • upholding use of vulnerability aggravator based on victim's age of three to four years old
  • upholding use of abuse of position of trust aggravator based on defendant’s occupying “position like a father” in relation to his victim
  • upholding use of vulnerability aggravator based on victim’s age of three to four years old
  • sexual abuse over a period of three days is insufficient to demonstrate an \ongoing pattern\
  • sexual abuse over a period of three days is insufficient to demonstrate an “ongoing pattern”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clarke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.