State v. Quick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• vacating plea where “both attorneys were alerted to deficiencies” in factual basis for enhancing factor
• vacating plea where “both 6 attorneys were alerted to deficiencies” in factual basis for enhancing factor
• vacating plea where sentence was enhanced with no factual basis
• vacating plea where sentence was enhanced with no factual basis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. SZPYRKA
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-01-14· cited 24×
• Wagner v. State
  Montana Supreme Court· 1995-02-15· cited 6×
• State of Arizona v. Steven D. Szpyrka
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-01-14
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2023-02-14

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. County of Fresno
  Supreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 187×
• United States v. State of California
  Ninth Circuit· 1980-11-06· cited 69×
• State v. Limpus
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-02-19· cited 28×
• State v. McVay
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1982-02-04· cited 14×
• State v. Draper
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-07-05· cited 14×
• State v. Vaughn
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-12-06· cited 13×
• State v. Jones
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-12-09· cited 9×
• United States v. Rainbow Family
  E.D. Texas· 1988-06-23· cited 9×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-09-04· cited 4×
• State v. Galvan-Cardenas
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-05-15· cited 3×