State v. Quas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defect in probable cause statement does not invalidate subsequent conviction
• “Both Rammel and Iorg condemn the use of evidence concerning matters not susceptible to quantitative analysis such as witness veracity . . . .” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).