· 3/29/1972
State v. Quandt
Citations
- 495 P.2d 158
- 17 Ariz. App. 33
- 1972 Ariz. App. LEXIS 609
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- in upholding defendant’s conviction for possession of illegal drugs under former statute, which contained exceptions for doctors and other medical professionals, court held: “it is the defendant’s responsibility” to show he fell within the class of excepted people
- in upholding defendant’s conviction for possession of illegal drugs under former statute, which contained exceptions for doctors and other medical professionals, court held: “it is the defendant’s responsibility” to show he fell within the class of excepted people
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Donofrio, Stevens
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.