Skip to main content
· 3/29/1972

State v. Quandt

Citations

  • 495 P.2d 158
  • 17 Ariz. App. 33
  • 1972 Ariz. App. LEXIS 609

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in upholding defendant’s conviction for possession of illegal drugs under former statute, which contained exceptions for doctors and other medical professionals, court held: “it is the defendant’s responsibility” to show he fell within the class of excepted people
  • in upholding defendant’s conviction for possession of illegal drugs under former statute, which contained exceptions for doctors and other medical professionals, court held: “it is the defendant’s responsibility” to show he fell within the class of excepted people

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Donofrio, Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.