Skip to main content
· 5/27/1971

State v. PUTNAM CTY. DEVELOP. AUTH.

Citations

  • 249 So. 2d 6
  • 2 ERC 1638

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • provisions of act are to be read as consistent with one another rather than in conflict, if there is any reasonable basis for consistency
  • Legislature cannot be charged with enacting contradictory provisions in same act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dekle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.