Skip to main content
· 8/4/2004

State v. Pulver

Citations

  • 95 P.3d 250
  • 194 Or. App. 423
  • 2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 934

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the contents of a price tag are not hearsay, but rather direct evidence of the asking price of an item
  • where the relevant question is the value of stolen merchandise, price tags are not assertions of the fact to be proved but direct evidence of that fact
  • conclud- ing that the witness’s testimony regarding the price of stolen merchandise was based on his personal observations and was not hearsay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Appeal, County, McShane, Haselton, Linder, Ortega

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.