North Dakota Supreme Court· 8/17/2017
State v. Pulkrabek
Citations
- 2017 ND 203
- 900 N.W.2d 798
- 2017 WL 3526708
- 2017 N.D. LEXIS 205
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating the purpose of the theft-consolidation statute is to unify “the numerous different types of thievery, i.e., false pretenses, larceny, and possession of stolen goods, into the single crime of theft,” reducing judicial inefficiency
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Vandewalle, Kapsner, McEvers, Crothers, Paulson, Tufte, Jensen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 1,454×
- State v. BourbeauNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1977-01-27· cited 19×
- State v. MartinezNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2015-07-01· cited 18×
- State v. CarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2017-07-31· cited 18×
- State v. MathreNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-12-01· cited 16×
- City of Mandan v. SperleNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-06-03· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.