State v. Puckett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• an order denying a motion for a new trial is reviewable only if the motion was based on juror misconduct or newly discov- ered evidence (citing State v. Sullens, 314 Or 436, 442-43, 839 P2d 708 (1992))
• an order denying a motion for a new trial is reviewable only if the motion was based on juror misconduct or newly discov- ered evidence (citing State v. Sullens, 314 Or 436, 442-43, 839 P2d 708 (1992))
• regarding our authority to review motions for new trial
• regarding our authority to review motions for new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Clark
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-06-04· cited 2×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Sullens
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-10-22· cited 30×
• State v. ALVAREZ-VEGA
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-02-16· cited 6×