State v. Pruitt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that we do not review evidence de novo under a harmless-error analysis because to do so would effectively deny a defendant a right to a jury trial on issues of fact and that “credibility, based on all the factors germane to believing or not believing a witness, is for the jury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Zaldana-Mendoza
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-10-02· cited 10×
• State v. Washington
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-10-16· cited 9×
• State v. Johns
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-11-20· cited 3×
• State v. Quick
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-12-01· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Manrique
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1975-01-30· cited 117×
• State v. Van Hooser
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 115×
• State v. Hockings
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-04-11· cited 53×
• State v. Guerrero
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1966-06-03· cited 7×
• State v. Howell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1970-10-02· cited 5×