District Court of Appeal of Florida· 11/2/2007

State v. Pruitt

Citations

967 So. 2d 1021
2007 WL 3225376

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that there is a presumption of correctness with regard to trial court's determination of facts where those factual findings are supported by competent, substantial evidence and that the trial court's application of the law to the facts is reviewed de novo
“There is no bright line answer; the only answer found in our case law is that the occupant must have a ‘reasonable opportunity’ to respond. Time periods less than five seconds are rarely deemed adequate, and periods in excess of fifteen seconds are often adequate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.