State v. Pruitt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that In re Commonwealth, 2025 MP 14 reinstating charges against a defendant required that all parties receive adequate notice
• holding that due process requires that meaningful notice of a hearing “must be reasonably calculated not only to apprise a party of the pendency of an action, but of its nature as well.”
• “[T]he liberty interests at stake in a criminal matter dictate an equal, if not greater, adherence to . . . due process requirements.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hazelton
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2018-01-11· cited 1×
• Yancey v. Yancey
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2017-10-23
• In re Commonwealth
  Sup. Ct. of the Comm. of the N. Mariana Islands· 2025-12-23
• Fayton v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2026-01-09
• Shahin v. State of Delaware
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2026-06-22