Nebraska Supreme Court· 2/11/2000
State v. Pruett
Citations
- 606 N.W.2d 781
- 258 Neb. 797
- 2000 Neb. LEXIS 28
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that overruling of motion to quash does not affect substantial right and is therefore not final, appealable order
- overruling of motion to quash claiming that alleged facts did not constitute crime
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hendry, Wright, Connolly, Gerrard, Stephan, McCormack, Miller-Lerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. LoydNebraska Supreme Court· 2005-05-06· cited 249×
- State v. VelaNebraska Supreme Court· 2006-09-08· cited 92×
- State v. PruettNebraska Supreme Court· 2002-02-01· cited 58×
- Gernstein v. LakeNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-05-19· cited 37×
- State v. ListonNebraska Supreme Court· 2006-04-21· cited 7×
- State v. LauckNebraska Supreme Court· 2001-01-26· cited 6×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- US Ecology, Inc. v. StateNebraska Supreme Court· 1999-10-29· cited 55×
- Tess v. LAYWERS TITLE INS. CORP.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1997-01-17· cited 43×
- City of Omaha v. MorelloNebraska Supreme Court· 1999-10-15· cited 38×
- Moulton v. BOARD OF ZONING APP., LINCOLNNebraska Supreme Court· 1996-11-08· cited 32×
- Hernandez v. BlankenshipNebraska Supreme Court· 1999-07-02· cited 32×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.