Supreme Court of Minnesota· 7/13/2011
State v. Prtine
Citations
- 799 N.W.2d 594
- 2011 Minn. LEXIS 385
- 2011 WL 2713566
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[I]t is an understandable trial strategy to concede an intent to kill in order to try to build credibility with the jury in the hope of avoiding conviction on the first-degree premeditated murder charge”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Consideration, Stras, Took
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. DiedeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-03-30· cited 184×
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-07-29· cited 88×
- State v. PilcherSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1991-07-26· cited 82×
- In re Disciplinary Action Against ColemanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-01-26· cited 79×
- State v. DeRosierSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-04-21· cited 67×
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-07-06· cited 65×
- State v. MalaskiSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-02-25· cited 58×
- State v. PrtineSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-06-30· cited 49×
- State v. WiplingerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-02-17· cited 48×
- State v. JorgensenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-05-01· cited 29×
- State, Lake Minnetonka Conservation District v. HornerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-10-12· cited 29×
- State v. Chavarria-CruzSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-06-30· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.