Ohio Court of Appeals· 6/15/2026

State v. Prouty

Citations

2026 Ohio 2239

Syllabus

Confrontation Clause; Hearsay; Cruel and Unusual Punishment. Redacted version of interview of child at child advocacy center entered into evidence did not violate Confrontation Clause and did not constitute inadmissible hearsay. Defendant did not demonstrate that his sentence constituted cruel and unusual punishment.

Judges: Waldick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Crawford v. Washington
Supreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
Blakemore v. Blakemore
Ohio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
Michigan v. Bryant
Supreme Court· 2011-02-28· cited 1,277×
State v. Arnold
Ohio Supreme Court· 2010-06-17· cited 197×
State v. Self
Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-12-12· cited 148×
State v. Issa
Ohio Supreme Court· 2001-08-29· cited 69×
State v. Goings
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-04-23· cited 4×
State v. Glaze
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-01-11· cited 4×
State v. Smith
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-15· cited 3×
State v. Blanton
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-04-04· cited 2×
State v. Wilson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-04-01· cited 2×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.