State v. Propps

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the defendant failed to establish prejudice where the omission of a knowledge element from marshaling instruction was cured by other instructions
• acknowledging that the marshaling instruction omitted an element of the offense but stating that “[b]ecause his trial counsel failed to object, defendant may not now assert error on appeal”
• stating the goal of the predecessor statute to chapter 715A was to address crimes that have an “adverse impact on the integrity of the financial system”
• “[Now- rule 5.803(6)] does not require the custodian of a record to have personal knowledge of each document. It is the impossibility of such recall that demonstrates the need for the exception.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).